'Secret' dolphin slaughter defies protests
By BOYD HARNELL
(This article was first published in the Japan
Times of Nov. 30, 2005)
Japan's annual slaughter of thousands of
dolphins began Oct. 8 in the traditional whaling town
of Taiji on the Kii
Peninsula of Honshu's Wakayama Prefecture. These "drive fisheries"
triggered demonstrations, held under the "Japan Dolphin Day" banner,
in 28 countries. The protests went
almost entirely unreported in Japan, where
only very few people are aware of what goes on.
The culling, spanning a period of six months, is
officially condoned as part of traditional culture, and is described as
"pest control" by practitioners. However, it is the inhumane way
in which the mammals are killed, by stabbing and spearing them, that
especially provokes such widespread revulsion.
Taiji fishermen begin the oikomi (fishery
drive) by going out to sea in motor boats to locate pods of dolphins. They
then place long steel poles with flared, bell-like ends into the water and
bang them to create a wall of sound that amplifies underwater and drives
their prey into a narrow cove. Once there, the dolphins' escape is cut off
by nets strung across the mouth of the cove. The following day — after
they have rested so, it is thought, their meat becomes more tender
— they are herded into another cove nearby where the slaughter is
carried out. Much of the meat is then processed for human consumption
— even though eating it could well be a very foolhardy thing to do.
A video with footage shot at Taiji in January 2004
by One Voice, a French-based animal rights group, and other footage from a
similar oikomi in Futo, Shizuoka Prefecture, by a cameraman who requested
anonymity, shows dolphins thrashing about wildly as they try to escape and
the water turns red.
Drive fisheries appear to be carried out in as
much secrecy as possible, and the killing cove in Hatagiri Bay at Taiji is
hidden between two mountains. There, a gigantic tarp is strung over the
shoreline to cut off the view from land, and paths leading to the cove are
closed off with chains and posted with signs reading "No
Trespassing!" and "Keep Out, Danger!" said Ric O'Barry an
official with One Voice.
O'Barry, a former trainer of the dolphins used in
the U.S. television series "Flipper," recently returned home to
Miami from Taiji after shooting footage of freshly killed dolphins being
lifted onto a pier in the harbor there. Speaking prior to his departure,
O'Barry said that the Taiji dolphin-killers are proud of what they do, and
boast of a tradition dating back 400 years. "However," he
commented, "if they are so proud of this, why do they take such pains
to hide their activity?"
O'Barry said he met with the local Taiji fishery
group and offered them a subsidy to stop
the killings, but was rebuffed
and told the dolphins were "pests" that competed with the
commercial fishery. Noting that there are no scientific studies showing
dolphins are responsible for falling fish stocks in the area, O'Barry
cited overfishing as the probable cause.
But it is not just those doing the killing who
make every effort to hide it from the world. Japanese officials also
strongly discourage outsiders from seeing, recording or protesting the
blood-letting.
During a fishery drive on Nov. 18, 2003, two
members of the Washington state-based Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
were arrested by police from Taiji's neighboring town of Shingu for
jumping into freezing waters and releasing 15 dolphins trapped in a net
awaiting slaughter. The pair, Alex Cornelisson from the Netherlands and
American Allison Lance- Watson, were held without bail and only released on
Dec. 9, 2003, after being indicted and fined for "forceful
interference with Japanese commerce." Meanwhile, two other Sea
Shepherd members staying in a trailer park in Taiji had their cameras,
film, computer and some personal belongings confiscated by police,
according to an online news release from the group. Undeterred, Sea
Shepherd is offering a $10,000 reward to anyone who provides the best
footage of the drive fishery.
In response to allegations that the oikomi
dolphins suffer from shock and die slowly, in a Sept. 19, 2005, letter to
British-based animal welfare and conservation charity the Born Free
Foundation, Jun Koda, Counselor of the Japanese Embassy in London, said:
"In some small parts of our country we have a long tradition of
consuming dolphin meat. Japanese fishermen are careful to minimize
suffering as soon as possible and cause as little pain to the dolphins as
possible."
Koda went on to say that the dolphin "almost
instantly meets its end within a maximum of 30 seconds and does not suffer
any pain."
A rebuttal from Born Free said the data in which
Koda based his claim is taken from Faeroe Island dolphin hunts in the
North Atlantic, which have not been subject to independent scrutiny and
hence have no bearing on the Japanese culls. Koda's assertions are also
countered by observers from One Voice and Sea Shepherd, who have reported
seeing wounded dolphins writhe in pain for almost six minutes before
succumbing to their wounds.
Meanwhile, another Japanese official was equally
forthright in countering critics' objections to killing dolphins for food.
In a telephone interview this month, Hideki Moronuki, assistant director
of the whaling section in the Far Seas Fishery Division of the Ministry of
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, expressed the view that, "If
someone eats a cow, why should one object to a dolphin being eaten;
they're all mammals."
He added, "If Australians want to eat
kangaroos, we don't care. . . . Please do not care what Japanese do. . . .
Dolphins and whales are part of Japanese food culture."
Furthermore, speaking in English, Moronuki
expressed his view that dolphins are killed humanely in the fishery
drives. Then, comparing the slaughter of a dolphin to that of a cow or a
pig, he declared: "Killing is killing."
O'Barry believes this is the attitude of most
Japanese fishermen. "They don't think of dolphins as intelligent,
highly complex animals that love to play and interact with people,"
he said.
But such sentiments are not confined to welfare
and conservation groups.
On April 6, 2005, U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg, a
Democrat from New Jersey, sponsored Senate Resolution 99, "Expressing
the sense of the Senate to condemn the inhumane and unnecessary slaughter
of small cetaceans . . . in certain nations." The submission,
currently referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations, not only cites
the fact that "those responsible for the slaughter prevent
documentation or data from the events from being recorded or made
public," but it describes how, "each year tens of thousands of
small cetaceans are herded into small coves in certain nations, are
slaughtered with spears and knives, and die as a result of blood loss and
hemorrhagic shock."
C.W. Nicol, the renowned environmentalist, author,
whaling expert and Japan Times columnist, recently made an M.B.E. by Queen
Elizabeth II, witnessed the Taiji dolphin slaughter while living there in
1978. Speaking last week, he said: "It's been a cancer in my gut ever
since. It's no good to kill an animal inhumanely, and to do so is not to
the advantage of Japan."
However, not all the captured dolphins are killed.
Every year, an unknown number of healthy young specimens are selected and
removed from the killing coves to be sold into the international dolphin
captivity industry, to be kept in aquariums, trained to perform at
dolphinariums or for swim-with-dolphin programs. At Taiji, those involved
appear to reap rich rewards in this way, and O'Barry said he was told
there that the fishery drives would stop and those carrying them out would
go back to catching lobsters and crabs if they were not offered huge sums
for "show" dolphins.
Echoing this, Nicol said he vehemently opposes the
dolphin massacre, adding, that "dolphins not selected for
dolphinariums should be returned to the sea."
However, in a further, darkly ironic twist,
serious health issues would seem to surround meat from the slaughtered
animals, which is available at supermarkets in Shizuoka Prefecture and
Kyushu.
At present, Hiroyuki Uchimi of the Japanese health
ministry's Food Safety Division explained, the provisional advisory safety
levels set in 1973, and still in effect for methyl mercury, are 2
micrograms a week for pregnant women and 3.4 micrograms a week for all
others, including children, for each kilogram of body weight.
But according to Tetsuya Endo, a member of the
Pharmaceutical Sciences faculty at Hokkaido's Health Science University,
mercury in a sample of the meat he tested in 2003 from a supermarket in
Ito, Shizuoka Prefecture, was 14.2 times higher than the government's
maximum advisory level. "It is terrible," he said this month.
Endo's finding was amply supported by those of a
2000-2003 joint survey of small cetacean food products sold in Japan by
the Daichi College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Fukuoka, Kyushu, the
university where Endo works, and the School of Biological Sciences in
Auckland, New Zealand. Published in 2005, this found that all dolphin food
products "exceeded the provisional permitted levels of 0.4 micrograms
per wet gram for total mercury and 0.3 micrograms per wet gram for methyl
mercury set by the Japanese government. The highest level of methyl
mercury was about 26 micrograms per wet gram in a food sample from a
striped dolphin, 87 times higher than the permitted level." Methyl
mercury is a particularly dangerous form of mercury, a neurotoxic metal.
The paper concluded, "The consumption of red
meat from small cetaceans . . . could pose a health problem for not only
pregnant women, but also for the general population."
Despite this — and that Senate Resolution 99,
which cites "warnings regarding high levels of mercury and other
contaminants in meat from small cetaceans caught off coastal regions"
— health warnings are not posted on the labels of such food products
sold in Japan.
In addition, critics of the drive fisheries claim
there is little monitoring of government culling quotas, already the
highest in the world. At present, these quotas set by the Ministry of
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries — with drive fishery licenses then
issued by prefectural governments to local fishery cooperatives —
stipulate that in the current 2005/06 season, 21,120 small cetaceans can
be killed, besides those selected for captivity. O'Barry estimates that
"more than 400,000 dolphins have been killed in Japan by dolphin
hunters over the past two decades."
O'Barry, who added that he is passionate about
banning dolphin hunts, said he even reversed his position on hunting
cetaceans "to be clowns" in aquarium shows after Cathy, one of
the dolphins that portrayed Flipper, died in his arms. As a trainer,
O'Barry said he discovered that dolphins were among the very few creatures
in the animal kingdom that were not only highly intelligent, but also
self-aware, like gorillas and humans, as evidenced by recognition of
themselves when they saw their reflection in a mirror or watched
themselves on a TV monitor.
Perhaps a similar self-awareness on the part of
dolphin hunters would point a way forward. This may already be happening,
as film-maker Hardy Jones of the California-based Blue Voice conservation
group found last month when he was in Futo, where recently there has been
a drastic decline in dolphin catches.
In a phone interview last week, Jones explained
that while in Futo he heard from a source close to former dolphin hunter
Izumi Ishii that "Ishii has switched from hunting dolphins to
conducting 'dolphin watch' tours. So far this year he's taken 2,600
tourists, who pay 4,000 yen each to enjoy seeing dolphins in the
wild."
As Jones observed, "With Ishii making more
money from the tours than he ever did as a dolphin hunter, he is setting a
great example for the Taiji fishermen to follow as well."
©
The Japan Times 2005 All rights reserved

Editor's note: Boyd Harnell is a
Japan-based journalist who has worked for Time Life TV, UPI, Kyodo News
and other media outlets.

This page last updated 2008-06-16
Eyes on Japan compiled and edited by
David Appleyard, 2001-2008 |
Privacy
Policy
|